Wednesday, 30 May 2012
Socialism 2012
The Workers Party are putting on a conference full of discussion and debate over Queen's Birthday weekend in Wellington.
There will be sessions on the economy, imperialism, Queer liberation, tino rangatiratanga and more. Activists and theorists Annette Sykes, Sue Bradford and Mike Treen will be speaking too. Find out the details here.
ISO speakers are going to contribute to sessions on neoliberalism in education and left perspectives.
If you're in Wellington come along and join the discussions!
Friday, 25 May 2012
Book Review: The Lacuna
How do you write a history of revolutionary lives and activity in the mid 20th century and sell it to the public? A tough order, certainly, but Barbara Kingsolver nails it with The Lacuna.
The book follows the life of a young man, Harrison Shephard, who finds himself living between the worlds of his Mexican mother and American father. He attends high school in New York during the great depression and the Bonus Army riots, and describes the desperation and anger which filled the streets during those days. He returns to Mexico to serve in the home of Mexico’s most famous artists and communists – Diego Rivera and Frieda Kahlo. Eventually, the household grows to include those homeless revolutionaries-in-exile, Natalia Sedova & Lev Bronstein - better known as Leon Trotsky. Following a split in the relationship between host and hosted, he serves for several years as one of Trotsky’s secretaries and finally, he finds himself living back in the country of his birth, the USA, where he has to live with his communist past, as well as a few “dirty little secrets” of his own, in the deep dark days of McCarthyism.
Though the person of Harrison Shephard is fictional, the people and social scene was real and is described in incredibly thoroughly researched detail. I cannot conceive of a more accessible account of Trotsky’s life in Mexico. Kingsolver does a fantastic job of describing his attitudes to the various struggles which occur during the years of the book, his relationship with Diego, Natalia and especially Frieda, and ultimately, his murder at the hands of a Stalinist agent.
Binding the whole story together is Harrison's understated but touching narration, and that of his eventual assistant. This medium presents the principle players in a sympathetic light, and brings out a touch of the people behind the legends. It also provides an interesting insight into small town life in the US after the second world war.
All in all, this book is an absolute masterpiece. For people interested in a picture of the lives of some of the key revolutionary players in the Americas in the pre-war period, you’d be hard pressed to find better. Alternately gripping and touching, a must read for all.
Kevin Hodder
Wednesday, 23 May 2012
Free Taame Iti and Te Rangikaiwhiria Kemara!
Free Taame Iti and Te Rangikaiwhiria Kemara!
Taame Iti and Te Rangikaiwhiria Kemara have been
sentenced to 2 and a-half years jail for possession of unlicensed firearms and
Molotov cocktails. Urs Signer and Emily Bailey's adjurned sentencing - and the suggestion of home detention - suggests further injustice to come.
This is a shameful end to a shameful process, a
process that began with the Labour Government passing the Terrorism Suppression
Act in the early 2002. At the time they assured the public that the laws would
only be used for exceptional cases of real danger, all code words for ‘Muslim
terror’ in the racist era of the ‘War on Terror’.
Then we were told in 2007 by newspaper editors, and
pundits both right and ‘left’ (Chris Trotter and ‘Bomber’ Bradbury deserve
mention in this context) to prepare ourselves for the revelations of horrific
preparations for home-grown terrorism. Those pundits and editors it now seems
were reading from a police-prepared script. There was no terrorist plot, except
for the plot of Howard Broad and the Blueboys to terrorise a Maori town early
in the morning. Over a dozen people had all the charges against them dropped; the Terrorism charges never made it to court. The whole case was a beat-up from start to finish.
Now Iti and Kemara are beginning what could be two
years in jail. As political site No Right Turn points out, only 15% of Arms Actoffenders are jailed, and then for an average of less than 10 months. The judge’s
sentencing here is a clear political act, and an outrage. The judge mentioned
one defendant’s “extreme anarchist views.” So now the sentencing is to reflect ‘thought
crimes’ too!
The police are making ‘no apologies’ for theircollapsed case, though, and, as for Iti's jailing, we imagine the pundits and
editors won't see it as a big deal. What's one more Maori in prison in this
structurally racist system?
Annette Sykes from the MANA movement sums up the situation, and provides vital historical context, and inspiration for resistance:
“Today is a sad day for justice in Aotearoa. There is no
way that Tame Iti and Te Rangikaiwhiria Kemara should have been jailed for two
and a half years.
The decision today is a case of history repeating itself.
In 1916 Tuhoe Prophet Rua Kenana was found not guilty for treason by a jury.
Despite the verdict, the judge concerned found him guilty of
resisting arrest and sentenced him to one year hard labour, followed by 18
months imprisonment. The jury were so incensed over the harshness of the
sentence, they submitted a petition and had the sentence reduced.
Tame and Te Rangikaiwhiria, much like their tipuna Rua Kenana,
have been wrongfully imprisoned and their sentence will be subject to a number
of appeals.
The real criminals in this case are still walking around as free
individuals – the police who entered the community of Ruatoki without
permission.
MANA will do everything in its power to achieve justice for the
people of Ruatoki.”
Free Taame Iti and Te Rangikaiwhiria Kemara!
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
Don't lock us out of education: Budget Day 2012
Thursday 24th is the day when the national budget for the coming year will be announced for the first time. Based on what has already been announced and discussed in the media, we can expect the most deeply cutting attacks on workers, beneficiaries and students in decades.
At Victoria University the students' association VUWSA and campaign group "We Are The University" (WATU) are organising a march from Campus down to Parliament under the banner of "Don't lock us out of education" to protest the proposed changes to the student allowance scheme, including limiting access to 4 years and effectively lowering the parental income cap which determines eligibility. These changes will make it even more difficult for those from low income backgrounds to gain qualifications, and make postgraduate work nearly impossible. They are also opposing proposed changes to how courses are funded at government level, which will see money being taken away from arts and humanities courses deemed to be of "low economic impact".
The National government claims to have a mandate to visciously impose auterity measures on workers, beneficiaries and students in New Zealand, while pouring millions of dollars of public money into private coffers. Only by organising collectively can we take a stand against they who would steal from the pockets of the poor to benefit themselves.
We will be meeting tomorrow at 12 noon in the Hunter Courtyard at the centre of the Kelburn Campus.
Kevin Hodder
Saturday, 19 May 2012
AFFCO Workers Stand Strong in Te Puke
"We're gonna march, march,
march to victory!
We're gonna fight right to the end!
For workers' rights, and freedom!
Aue!
Ake, ake, kia kaha e!"
A new take on the folk song dedicated to
the Māori Battalion echoed though the streets
of Te Puke on Saturday as over 500 locked-out meat workers,
whānau and
supporters made their way through the town to cheer the workers and build
support for their cause. The march in Te Puke is the
latest in a series of protests attended by AFFCO workers from around the North
Island. Unionised meat workers at
AFFCO-owned plants have been locked out for 77 days now as the company
continues in its attempts to crush the union.
But members of the Meat Workers Union have stayed staunch and refused to
allow the company to run roughshod over their rights. We were proud to march with them today.
AFFCO
claims that the dispute is about managerial control. They say that the influence of the union is
too great, and that it is hampering efforts to increase productivity. But behind the company's complaint lies a
speed-up. AFFCO is attempting to extract
more work - more carcasses per hour - out of its workforce. Speeding-up production always comes at a cost
- usually to health and safety. Furthermore,
AFFCO has no plans to pay workers at its plants any more for the faster rate of
production, but rather wants to reduce the coverage of collective agreements to
ensure a more pliant workforce.
Unsurprisingly, the union wasn't having a bar of it. So when negotiations for a new agreement came
up, AFFCO targeted some union members and locked them out.
After
their co-workers were selectively locked out, the remaining union members
walked out in a series of one- and two-day strikes. The company responded by locking those
workers out too. So now more than 1,000
workers are unable to work, and have to go without income. The company even issued a special lock-out
over the four days of the Easter break, so that it didn't have to give holiday
pay to workers who belonged to the union.
But the workers have continued to take the fight to the bosses -
travelling all the way to Motueka to picket the house of AFFCO owner Michael
Talley.
Talleys-AFFCO cries poor
At
the most recent attempt at negotiations last week, workers were confronted with
the bizzare sight of the AFFCO and the Talleys crying poor. "There has been considerable hardship to
the company. It has been able to
function, but at much lower levels of production. Pain is working both ways" AFFCO lawyers
told the employment court last Wednesday.
The Talley family, which owns AFFCO, are the fourth richest family in
New Zealand with holdings of over $300 million.
In
reality, it is the workers who are hurting.
The lockout is putting tremendous pressure on workers, who can no longer
obtain an income to pay their bills. The
strain is taking its toll on relationships.
"It's splitting up families", says one worker who used to work
alongside his two brothers at AFFCO Rangiuru.
They've left to seek work in Australia with which to support themselves.
A
stuggle for all workers
Behind
the struggle at the meat works lies a wider assault on the rights of all
workers in New Zealand. It's no
co-incidence that the AFFCO lockout comes at the same time as the Ports of
Auckland dispute and strikes at Oceania rest homes. Bosses across New Zealand are looking for
ways to make workers pay for money lost during the recession, and hammering
down pay and conditions, speeding up the pace of work and making working hours
'flexible' is how they want to do it.
AFFCO's own proposal to put new workers automatically on non-union
individual agreements is something that the National Party wants to make law
for all workers.
But
the fight is not over yet. Despite their
own hardship, Talleys-AFFCO workers have been energetic in supporting other workers
in struggle, most notably at the Ports of Auckland. On Satuday, Auckland wharfies repaid the favour,
several travelling down to Te Puke to support the meat workers. Help is also
coming from other directions. With so
many families facing hardship, many iwi have put pressure on Talleys-AFFCO -
significant as many of the stock that end up at AFFCO meatworks are iwi-owned.
Make
no mistake - this is a class battle.
Just as their predecessors did during the Waihi gold miners' strike 100
years ago, AFFCO workers in Te Puke have found local business owners to be
largely unsympathetic. More support is
needed from workers in other unions.
$50,000 is being donated by the union movement every week. This is a
great start, but doesn't go far when 1,500 workers and over 5,000 children are
affected - as CTU President Helen Kelly told the rally, it's under $50 per family per week. Every unionist shoud organise a collection
in their workplace and community. There are details at www.mwu.org.nz on how to donate – anyone can organize
a collection, and make sure money keeps coming in.
In
Wellington this morning our comrades collected over $550 for the meatworkers at
the Newtown market. People who came to our Dunedin branch meeting last Thursday donated $75
to the fund, and last week unionists in Dunedin collected over $400. Collections are being organized by other political groups, unions, and individuals in the community
too.
"I
plan to stay strong until the end" says Finlay, who works at AFFCO
Rangiuru. When he does, it will be a victory for all the workers of Aoteaoa -
so we should fight together to make it happen.
Cory Anderson
Thursday, 17 May 2012
Dunedin: Defending Abortion Rights
These last weeks there has been a social policy tirade against the rights of women, welfare reforms set to humiliate and degrade women on the domestic purpose benefit, reforms which target working class mothers pushing them back into work after a second child on the DPB.
Last Friday outside the Dunedin Hospital there was a different type of attack on women. A different kind of assail on a women’s right to choose. This was not the first time a group of anti-abortion campaigners stood outside the hospital harassing women and it won’t be the last.
After seeing pictures in the local newspaper of lone counter-protesters to these religious fanatics, an ISO meeting on abortion rights was organised with the highest turn out of attendants of the year. One of the people who attended was a lone counter-protester who actively encouraged the ISO to get involved. It didn’t take much encouraging and the following morning a group of 10 ISO members and supporters turned up and stood in front of the anti-abortionists blocking the offensive and guilt-tripping signs.
At one point there would have been over 30 people arguing, criticising and ridiculing their conservative justifications for such a blatant attack on women. Most counter-protesters were students angry after walking past this protest every Friday for most of the year. Many had stopped to debate them before but never in such show of force, giving a boost of confidence to the on-going confrontation. In the current political climate where women's rights are under attack it is important to show that we will not lie down to right-wing conservative assaults on the oppressed.
This week there were expensively produced anti-abortion leaflets distributed through campuses across the country. New Zealand's abortion laws still force women to go through too many hoops to access a service that should be freely available on demand.
Our counter-protests continue, and this photo shows today's picket in support of women's rights. Abortion: a woman's right to choose.
Rowan McArthur
Tuesday, 15 May 2012
The Politics of the Rising European Left
by Alex Callinicos [from Socialist Worker UK]
Europe's political leadership is bankrupt. This is true literally, as we can see with the latest stage of the banking crisis unfolding in Spain. If the eurozone continues to unravel, there simply won’t be enough money to save it.
It is also true morally and intellectually. And everyone knows it. This is the main lesson of the recent elections.
The pattern is clear. The centre—which stands for the austerity policies that Angela Merkel is determined to hardwire into the institutional structure of the European Union—is being squeezed. And there is polarisation further to the right and to the left.
The advances the extreme right are making are very frightening. Chrysi Avgi (Golden Dawn), which won seven percent of the vote in the Greek elections, aren’t Euro-fascists in suits. They are hard, street-fighting Nazis.
But it’s the growth of the radical left on which I want to focus. The clearest case is of course Syriza, the Coalition of the Radical Left in Greece, which got 16.8 percent of the vote in the elections ten days ago. Polls suggest that it might win 25 percent or more if there is a re-run in June.
To this we have to add Jean-Luc Mélenchon of the Left Front, who polled 11.01 percent in the first round of the French presidential elections last month. And there are other cases.
The Dutch government collapsed recently under the weight of the austerity policies it had helped Brussels impose. It was the right-wing populist Geert Wilders who pulled the rug from under the ruling coalition, but the radical-left Socialist Party is top of the polls.
What is the politics of this rising left? Over-simplifying a little, it is essentially some version or other of left reformism. It’s true that Syriza includes within its ranks an assortment of far-left groups, but the dominant force, Synaspismos, originates in the more accommodating and pro-European wing of the Greek Communist movement.
Breakaway
Mélenchon led a left-wing breakaway from the French Socialist Party after serving as a minister in the disastrous Plural Left government that held office in 1997–2002. The most powerful organised force within the Left Front is the French Communist Party(CP) which for decades has hung onto the coat tails of the Socialist Party.
A marked feature of the French presidential elections was the poor performance of the revolutionary left. Olivier Besancenot ran ahead of the CP in 2002 and 2007. But this time the candidates of both his New Anticapitalist Party and of Lutte Ouvrière, which in the days when Arlette Laguiller ran for it had a high profile, were eclipsed by Mélenchon.
It’s not surprising that left reformist parties are making the running against austerity. They are filling a space left by the rightward shift of mainstream social democracy. Parties like Labour and the French Socialists are now called “social liberal” because of their embrace of neoliberalism.
Figures such as Mélenchon, the Syriza leader Alex Tsipras, and, in this country [Britain], George Galloway are able to reach out to traditional social-democratic voters by articulating their anger in a familiar reformist language. Ed Miliband and François Hollande are trying to recalibrate their parties’ messages to relate to this anger, but their unwillingness to break with social liberalism leaves a big space to their left.
In any case, whether it is mainstream social democrats or their more radical challengers who are able to ride to office thanks to the rebellion against austerity, they will come under enormous pressure to accommodate with the German government and the financial markets.
After the Greek elections, Tsipras made an excellent statement demanding an end to the “barbarous” austerity programme. But then he wrote a much less confrontational letter to the presidents of the European Council and the European Parliament.
This kind of ambiguity is inherent in any version of reformism, which seeks simultaneously to express workers’ resistance to capitalism and to contain it within the framework of the system. But it underlines the necessity of building a revolutionary left that is part of this great movement sweeping Europe but maintains its own political identity.
[For more on the struggle in Greece, read "We Will Defy the Bankers: Greek Workers Speak Out", "Workers in Greece say No to Parties of Austerity", and "Greek Golden Dawn Nazis: a Warning from History"]
Saturday, 12 May 2012
Remembering Our History: Centenary of the Commencement of the Waihi Strike
Today is the
centenary of the start of the Waihi Strike, an occasion to commemorate one of the most epic struggles of men and
women in the history of the working class. On the centenary of Black Tuesday in
November we will remember loyal union member Frederick Evans [pictured above], battered to death
by a squad of hired thugs and police as they stormed the Waihi miners’ union
hall.
On Monday 13th
May 1912 a union mass meeting in Waihi voted to send the mining companies a
message the next day:
‘members of the Waihi Workers’ Union employed in the
mines have ceased work, and will not resume until such time as the Union
receives an assurance from the Companies that the disbandment of the recently
formed Engine Drivers’ Union is insisted upon by them, and also until all
engine-drivers and firemen employed on the field, other than members of the Amalgamated
Society of Engineers, become members of this Union. If the Unions demands are
not granted before 12 o’clock today all members of the union employed in
batteries etc shall cease work.’
The goldfields strike
lasted six months, ending in defeat after mass jailings and violence against
the miners and their families. New Zealand was changed forever. Down went the dream
of revolutionary syndicalism that socialism could be attained through
industrial action alone. Politics counted after all. The Union had been
confronted by the power of the capitalist state.
‘What does this power
mainly consist of? It consists of special bodies of armed men which have
prisons, etc., at their command.’ (Lenin, State and Revolution, 1917)
After Waihi, and
further state violence and union defeats in 1913, the pendulum in the working
class movement swung from industrial to political action. The Labour Party would
be founded in 1916, and in 1935 the erstwhile revolutionaries who had thrown
themselves into the Waihi struggle would be forming the government.
[Strikers and their supporters marching. The caption reads "who said 600?", challenging a number given in the Herald]
But this is
running ahead. A little background information is needed to explain why the
Waihi miners struck against, apparently, the existence of another union. It
must be said straightaway that this engine drivers union was nothing but a scab
union instigated by the Waihi Goldmining Company as a stratagem to defeat the Waihi
Miners’ and Workers’ Union, which by 1912 had become a powerful threat to
profits.
It had not
always been so. Under the competitive contract system at Waihi miner was set
against miner. Contractor miners bid against each other for work. The system
meant that contractors had to drive their hired men hard. The work rate was breakneck,
exhausting and dangerous, often times fatally. But the system was splendidly
profitable. In 1906 the Waihi Goldmining Company paid out a bonanza of 75% on
each share.
In 1907 the
Waihi miners’ union had been to the Arbitration Court in an attempt to get the
competitive contract system abolished, but Justice Sim ruled in the employers’
favour. The compulsory arbitration system was brought in by the Liberal
government in 1894. The chief purpose of the Industrial Conciliation and
Arbitration Act was to prevent strikes, but it also gave unions recognition and
legal protection. The law bound the unions to Court decisions on terms and
condition, or ‘awards’, and outlawed strikes.
The first
workers to break out of this stranglehold were coal miners on the West Coast.
In 1908 the Blackball miners took their case for increasing their meal break
from 15 to 30 minutes to the Arbitration Court but could not get satisfaction
from Justice Sim. The miners defied the Court and struck. The mine company
conceded and the unionists were fined by the Court, but refused to pay. The
Blackball victory was midwife to miners’ unions uniting in a Federation of
Miners which declared for “The World’s Wealth for the World’s Workers.”
[Strikers jeer scabs being taken in. Note the presence of women in the protests, active in the struggle]
At Waihi
successive presidents of the miners’ union found that they could not get
regular employment with the mining companies and were forced to move away for
work. When Bill Parry was elected in president in 1909 the union overcame the
problem of victimisation by making the presidency a salaried position and a
Workmen’s Inspector of Mines, as it was legally entitled to do. Parry
immediately set about closing stopes until they were timbered and made safe.
The Waihi miners’ joined the miners’ federation in 1909 in which year the organisation was renamed to the Federation of Labour. The Federation grew to include labourers, tramwaymen, watersiders, shearers and flaxmillers. By its 1912 conference it had acquired the Maoriland Worker newspaper, and had 15,000 members. The leaders of the ‘Red Feds’ were members of the revolutionary Socialist Party, but the ideas that came to the fore were the syndicalist ideas of Industrial Unionism, as influenced by people such as British revolutionary socialist Tom Mann and by the Industrial Workers of the World. At the 1912 conference the following magnificent preamble to the rules was adopted:
The working-class and the employing-class have nothing
in common. There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among
millions of working-people, and the few, who make up the employing-class, have
all the good things of life.
Between these two classes a struggle must go on until
the workers of the world organise as a class, take possession of the earth and
the machinery of production, and abolish the wages system.
We find that the centreing of the management of
industries into fewer and fewer hands makes the trades unions unable to cope
with the ever-growing power of the employing-class. The trade unions foster a
state of affairs which allows one set of workers to be pitted against another
set of workers in the same industry, thereby helping to defeat one another in
wage-wars.
These conditions can be changed and the interest of
the working-class upheld only by an organisation formed in such a way that all
its members in any one industry, or in all industries, if necessary, cease work
whenever a strike or lock-out is on in any department thereof, thus making an
injury to one an injury to all.
Instead of the conservative motto: “A fair day’s wages
for a fair day’s work,” our watchword is “Abolition of the wages-system.”
It is the historic mission of the working-class to do
away with capitalism. The army of production must be organised, not only for
everyday struggle with capitalists, but also to carry on production when
capitalism has been overthrown. By organising industrially we are forming the
structure of the new society within the shell of the old.
The way out of
the compulsory arbitration bind was for unions to cancel their registration
under the Act. The Waihi union leadership pursued this aim and twice got a
majority for cancellation in 1910. But
these votes did not satisfy the registrar as they were not absolute majorities
due to non-attendance at meetings. On the third ballot, this time taken at the
mine entrance, the required majority was achieved and de-registration was
gazetted in May 1911.
Free at last and
relying on their own strength and the support of the Federation of Labour, the
Waihi miners won in June 1911: a change from the competitive contract to a
co-operative contract system, better pay rates, and a right to renegotiate in a
year’s time. The level of control exercised by the union was such that it
effectively controlled the price of co-operative contracts, in which all in the
party shared equally.
It was decided that if a party could not make a
satisfactory wage under the price contracted for, the members of the said party
would ask the employers for a rise in price. Failing an agreement on such a
basis, the Union would fix a price calculated to produce a living wage, and no
unionist would take the job for less than the Union price. This rule was
strictly and loyally adhered to by the men. One job was held up for four or
five months, although the company offered within one-halfpenny per ton of the
Union price. (Holland et al, The Tragic Story of the Waihi Strike, 1913)
Never had the
Waihi miners had it as good and never had attendance at union meeting been as
great. All was put at risk by an arbitrationist union being recognised. All it
took for registration under the Act was for a union to have 15 members and
there being no other registered union. The registered union would be the
official union and the awards of the Arbitration Court would be binding on all
workers in that industry or place no matter how unrepresentative the union.
The employers
had used this ruse before, in Auckland. They set about it in Waihi amongst the
engine drivers and firemen. A hand-picked minority were selected to attend a
meeting, but only 13 attended. At a second meeting, on 11th May
1912, a qualifying 25-30 engine-drivers and firemen were cobbled together to
form the arbitrationist union. The scene was set for the inevitable clash.
Martin Gregory
Friday, 11 May 2012
Wellington Queers the Night!
by Kevin Hodder
At least 200 people congregated in Waitangi Park, Wellington, and marched last night as part of the second annual Queer the Night march against homophobia and transphobia.
Why march? Here's some of the reasons from the leaflet created and distributed by the Queer Avengers:
“In 2011, after a series of queer bashings in Wellington, hundreds of people from the community came together to reclaim the streets, to paint the town pink & purple, to Queer the Night. Out of this march the Queer Avengers formed.
This is the annual Queer the Night march. This time we’re particularly supporting Pink Shirt Day on the 18thof May, and more generally opposing all homophobia and transphobia.
We support the formation of Queer-Straight Alliances (QSAs) in all schools. We support education on gender and sex. We demand recognition of all sexual orientations and identities. ... We’re here to say that, in schools and everywhere else, it doesn’t get better until we make it better”
After a loud and energetic march through downtown, resplendent with placards and banners as well as glitter, rainbows and sparkles, we congregated in Cuba Mall for a short series of speakers.
One woman spoke on one of the hidden issues faced by queer youth – homelessness. Intolerance within their families often means that queer youth are forced out of their homes and onto the streets, with little to no support. This only serves to compound the problem of self harm and suicide among queer youth who are often excluded from the communities that should be supporting them – family, schools, churches etc. She said “The statistics [about self harm and suicide rates] don’t matter to me. As long as one child considers self harm, considers suicide or find themselves living on the streets, that’s one too many!”
A student spoke of her experience leading a QSA in her school – “A year ago I attended the first Queer the Night and at the time I felt so alone and isolated. So much has happened to change that in the last year”, “we know there’s a problem [in our schools] – We don’t need stats”. Speaking about the role of QSAs in creating safe spaces, she said “We shouldn’t need safe spaces – our schools and communities should be doing their damned jobs!” This was reinforced by a transgender student who spoke of the 7 schools he had been through in 3 years, the friends he had lost to suicide due to constant bullying and harassment at school, and of being kicked out of his own home when he came out as considering himself male.
Kassie Hartendorp, one of the founders of the Queer Avengers and an organiser for Schools Out, spoke eloquently about the problem faced in schools. “The schools claim there’s nothing they can do – it’s just a system [they have to work through]. Well your system isn’t Fucking Working!” and that’s the real problem. Joel Cosgrove from the Workers Party said it plain – “They expect us to integrate into the current system, but why would we want to? ... We can’t rely on a broken system... We need to give our support to women's groups, to Maori groups, to immigrant groups – to all the groups that understand oppression to defeat all oppression in this fucked up system.”
Recently, Wellington news media was all over the story of two women who claimed they were ejected from a public bar for being publicly affectionate. Whatever really happened in that particular case, the reality is that every day queer people are turned away from bars and other public venues and face harassment for expressing their sexuality or gender. In our schools this takes on a different tone in the form of personal bullying, but it is no less exclusionary. In workplaces and public services, lower wages, exclusion from work and denial of services based solely on ones gender or sexuality is common. Bashings and assaults of queer and transgendered people are so common place as to scarcely ever make news. Tragically, murders in the Wellington region have made the new these last years too.
In the workplace, the streets or in our schools, discrimination kills.
The struggle to end queer oppression and discrimination needs to be part of a wider struggle to end oppression in all fields of life. “An injury to one is an injury to all”, as the Wobblies said, and it is for this reason that any struggle to create a better world must, by definition, include the struggle for queer rights and to end discrimination based on sexuality or gender.
The International Socialist Organisation is proud to have been out in support of Queer the Night in Wellington.
It doesn't get better until we make it better!
[Photo credit: thanks to Chloe Hitch for kindly making her photographs available to us for this report. You can view video of the rally from Andy Boreham here]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)